« Yawm-e Ali | Main | Admitting to a Permanent State of War »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341cd67353ef00d8342d57bf53ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Quick Links:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Teeluca

An interesting rant by Abvinav Aima. Of course, I agree that American policy has been particularly wrongheaded in the Arab areas (I think we have more of an Arab problem than a Muslim problem), but what's with this ahistorical, just plain wrong obsession with the Khalifat:

"Never mind the stripping away of their sovereignty that has left them naked to exploitation since the collapse of the Ottoman Empire"

I'm aware of the Salafist focus on restablishing Khalifah as a religious reality, quite out of line with the historical reality of the numerous, at times conflicted, caliphates in the Arab, and later, Ottoman empires. But the suggestion that the demise of the Ottoman Empire has anything to do with unprotected Muslims is just plain foolish and makes me question Aima's purpose.

Sister Soljah

Thanks for the interesting links. :-)

islamoyankee

Teeluck, I agree that the emphasis on the Khalifat is problematic, especially since the idea of the Khalif was essentially symbolic and little interest to the broader Muslim population until it was threatened.

However, I read the sentence you quote slightly differently. I took it to mean that with the end of the Ottoman Empire (meaning Ottoman protection), the British were able to treat Palestine as a play thing.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Misc. - islamicate

  • Alltop
    Featured in Alltop
  • CC information
  • www.flickr.com
    islamoyankee's photos More of islamoyankee's photos
Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 10/2003
Related Posts Widget for Blogs by LinkWithin

Google Stuff

  • search
     
  • ads

Become a Fan